Ripping DVDs for IPhone Or IPod Viewing: Legal
PerspectivesFriday, March 19, 2010 at 06:55 AM EDT
This is a guest blog post by Sherman
Nicodemus. This is my second post in a series I'm sharing on "Moving at the Speed of Creativity"
this week. If you have questions about this post I'll be glad to answer them
via comments here.
The advent of digital encoding technologies has brought a revolution to the
entertainment and media industries, and afforded a wealth of new media
consumptive options for consumers. In his song and music video, "Welcome to the Future,"
country singer Brad Paisley reflects on how, in his childhood, he dreamed of
watching TV in the car on an eight hour road trip. This dream is a reality
today thanks to the proliferation of iPods and other portable media players,
as
well as the availability of commercial audio and video titles in electronic
formats.
The landscape of consumer media options continues to be fraught with legal
battles, however, in large part because of media conglomerates' desires to
maintain control over the "intellectual property" they produce, license, and
sell. Entertainment artists and industry workers also share a stake in
maintaining control and therefore profitability for media file licensing.
When it comes to the legality of making copies of DVD movies a consumer in
the United States has legally purchased, the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) as well as the DVD Copy
Control Association (DVD CCA) are two fronts from which companies and
organizations have challenged the legality of copying, archiving, and
compressing DVDs. In her October 2008 article, "DVD
Ripping: The Latest on the Legal Front," Julie Jacobson opens with the
following statement:
Here's where we stand today on the legality of DVD ripping:
We're not quite sure if it's legal.
The English WikiPedia
defines
"ripping" as:
...the process of copying audio or video content to a hard
disk,
typically from removable media. The word is used to refer to all forms of
media. Despite the name, neither the media nor the data in it is damaged after
extraction.
The article further explains in the "legality"
section:
On the whole, it is legal for an individual in the United
States
to make a copy of media he/she owns for his/her own personal use. For
instance,
making a copy of a personally-owned audio CD for transfer to an MP3 player for
that person's personal use would be legal.
In the case where media contents are protected using some effective copy
protection scheme, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act makes it illegal to
circumvent that copy protection scheme. This law makes it illegal to rip most
commercial DVDs as they are typically protected by CSS
encryption.
The legality of DVD ripping depends on your location, however. Again according to the
WikiPedia
article:
In countries such as Spain, anyone is allowed to make a private
copy of a copyrighted material for oneself, and the source copy does not even
have to be legal. Making copies for other people, however, is forbidden if
done
for profit. This is also true for Sweden. In Australia, copies of any legally
purchased music may be made by its owner, as long as it is not distributed to
others and its use remains personal. In the United Kingdom, making a private
copy of copyrighted media without the copyright owner's consent is illegal:
this includes ripping music from a CD to a computer or digital music player.
The UK government has made proposals to allow people to make copies of music
for personal use.
This is a confusing state of affairs.
The English WikiPedia article for "DVD Ripper" offers the following
definition:
A DVD ripper is a software program that facilitates copying the
content of a DVD to a hard disk drive. They are mainly used to transfer video
on DVDs to different formats, to edit or back up DVD content, and for
converting DVD video for playback on media players and mobile devices. Some
DVD
rippers include additional features, such as the ability to decrypt DVDs,
remove copy preventions and make disks unrestricted and
region-free.
The article also
includes a detailed table listing and comparing different versions of DVD
ripping software.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
provides a concise overview of the legal and technical issues at stake in DVD
ripping on its page, "Hollywood v.
DVD." The page (as of 14 March 2010) states:
With billions sold, the DVD remains the principle way that
millions of consumers experience digital video. Yet Hollywood has, from the
birth of this format, imposed unprecedented restrictions on what customers can
do with the DVDs they own.
Hollywood has argued in lawsuits and before policy-makers around the world
that it is always illegal to make a digital copy ("rip") of a DVD. Even if you
own it, even if you're trying to make a personal copy so that your children
don't scratch the original, even if you want to make a copy to watch on your
iPod, even if you want to skip those annoying "unskippable" commercials at the
beginning.
Hollywood has also sued companies that try to provide DVD owners with the
same kinds of innovations that we take for granted with CDs—such as a
"DVD jukebox" that lets you watch your own DVDs around your own house from a
central home media server.
The difference between DVDs and previous media formats—like the
CD—is the CSS encryption system used to "scramble" the digital bits on
the DVD. Thanks to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a federal law
passed a the behest of Hollywood, consumers enjoy fewer rights with respect to
copyrighted works that are protected by "technical protection measures" (aka
DRM) than they did with prior formats. Congress was told that the DMCA was
necessary to prevent "digital piracy" online, but the use of anti-consumer DRM
has been a total failure at preventing "piracy." Instead, the legacy of the
DMCA has been to penalize legitimate consumers and impair competition and
innovation. So Hollywood today clings to DRM not because it has any impact on
"piracy," but because it allows the movie studios to dictate the features and
innovations that legitimate companies can deliver to legitimate
consumers.
The bottom line for consumers today in the United States is that
intellectual property / copyright law forces the legal REPURCHASE of media
which was originally bought in CD and/or DVD formats, and the consumer wants
in
a computer / mobile media player format. This was affirmed by Greg Sandoval's
March 3, 2010, article for CNET, "RealNetworks
surrenders in RealDVD case." Greg wrote:
The MPAA filed suit to stop the sale of RealDVD, a software
that
hands users the ability to copy and store films to a hard drive.
From the outset of Real's struggle, the company appeared to be on shaky
ground.
Real argued that consumers possessed the right to backup their DVDs, just as
they have a right to make a copy of their songs for personal use. Real told
the
court the company was just trying to offer consumers the means to do that and
that they had a fair use right to do that.
But after hearing initial arguments from Real and the studios, Patel [the
judge
in the case] quickly slapped a preliminary injunction that prevented sales of
RealDVD. Things went down hill from there.
Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier
Foundation, a group that advocates for tech companies and Internet users,
defended Real's pursuit of the case. He said Real could have provided real
benefit to consumers, if not with RealDVD, then eventually with a DVD player
that would have incorporated some of the software's copying abilities. Real
was
working on a player, codenamed Facet, which would have created copies of DVDs
and stored more than 70 films on its hard drive.
"(Real's testimony) made it clear that Real was out to deliver to consumers
a product that people wanted to see," von Lohmann said. "I think the message
this sends is if you get into the business of enabling consumers to do with
DVDs what they've long done with CDs, you'll get sued out of the business. I
think that's bad news for consumers. What that means is that if you want to
create a digital back-up of your movies, you have to pay for that a second
time
on iTunes."
The EFF quoted part of this article in their March 3rd "In The News" post,
"RealNetworks surrenders
in RealDVD case."
Now that we've explored some of the legal perspectives on DVD ripping, I'd
like to highlight two functional solutions for DVD ripping. Bear in mind, as
explained above, that the legality of using these software programs depends on
your geography.
Handbrake is:
...an open source, GPL-licensed, multiplatform, multithreaded
vio trancoder, available for Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows.
Somewhat ironically, I first learned about Handbrake when visiting an Apple
Store and asking about software options for encoding DVDs. Of course the Apple
Store wasn't and isn't selling Handbrake:
as
a GPL-licensed program, it is free and legally must remain free: No one can
sell it. I've used Handbrake software on my Mac to rip and compress numerous
DVD movies. The program allows users to select the target platform for the
encoded / compressed MP4 video version. Most of my Handbrake-encoded movies
are
around 600 MB in size, but some (like the two part disc series in the 2+ hour
movie LOTR
- ROTK) are over 1 GB.
Handbrake is great, but some DVD movie creators have become more
sophisticated in their use of "Content Scramble
System" methods in encoding DVDs so Handbrake cannot (at present) properly
rip them. One example is the DVD of WALL-E. My initial attempt to
rip WAL-E with Handbrake appeared to succeed, but the order of the encoded
scenes was mixed up. To remedy this, I used the commercially available RipIt application (sold by the little app factory) to create a
full-resolution backup of my purchased DVD. Then, I used Handbrake to create a
compressed MP4 version playable on iPhones and iPods.
Hopefully copyright laws in the United States, the UK, and other countries
will change to legally permit DVD and CD purchasers to make THEIR OWN archive
copies of media files. Until then (and even afterwards) we'll likely see
continued legal fights by organizations and media conglomerates to prevent
commercial, copy-protected DVD and CD ripping by consumers wanting to avoid
the
re-purchase of their movies and songs to realize Brad Paisley's vision in,
"Welcome to the Future."
For more about these issues, check out The Digital Freedom Campaign's
website on www.digitalfreedom.org.
Technorati Tags:
copy, dvd, rip, ripping, ripit, handbrake, eff, dmca, intellectual, property
|