Frank Rich revisits the run-up to Iraq

My personal thanks to Frank Rich for a wonderful column in Sunday's NY Times, titled The Ides of March 2003, reviewing who said what, and what happened when, in the days just before and after our invasion of Iraq.

No white house investigation of Plame leak--hey, if a Dem didn't do it, screw it

Remember the President's somber face when first discussing the leak of Valerie Plame's status with the CIA? Remember his somber assurance to the nation that the leak would be investigated and wrongdoers punished?

Hell, remember WMD?

And the beat-down goes on

And on it goes...real earnings down
If life feels like it's getting harder, it is...for most of us. From the current BLS release on real earnings:

Newt's back, with another con (tract, that is)

The man who gave you the contract with America, two divorces, a fear of women's urinary infections, and a recent admission that he was having an extramarital affair at the same time he was leading the effort to impeach Clinton for having sex with Monica Lewinsky is...back.

Pathetic wingnut attempt to use Clinton to excuse firings of US Attorneys

Lots of little wingnuts have taken to trying to defuse the scandal over the recent firings of US Attorneys by citing a 1993 NY Times article, but only its abstract, which happens to read as follows:

Quote of the day, 3-13-07

Anyone can say they support the troops and we should take them at their word, but the proof will come when it's time to provide the money
Dick Cheney speaking at a meeting of The American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

[Still waiting for Cheney or any of his ilk to apply that same reasoning to training & equipping the troops, providing care for soldiers returning from combat zones in Afghanistan and Iraq, and providing care for all vets during the remainder of their lives (rather than viewing the VA budget as a "drag on the economy" as one VA official said a while back).]

The National Security Letters story, and WaPo's rather large error

I've resisted writing about the recent DOJ audit of the FBI's use of National Security Letters (NSLs), partly because it's so complicated and partly because I just had the feeling that the problem was bigger than the impression you got from the mainstream media.

Another 'say what?' set of labor statistics from BLS

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is the agency that issues the monthly reports on jobs, employment & unemployment, wages, and a host of other information on our collective economic health.

In keeping with the cheerleader mentality that views public confidence as more important than the reality on which the confidence is based, the BLS issued its report on February employment, and mainstream publications like the NY Times published stories based on various pieces of that report.

Halliburton Going To UAE: What A Shocker! (NOT!)

And just when you thought the inept and incredibly corrupt GOP and Herr Chimp couldn't pull off anything even more, well, let's just say it don't look good....

Just two simple questions for the day

I read a lot stuff that simply makes no sense, and a lot more that calls into question whether some authors realize that the natural implications of what they say contradict other opinions and beliefs they seem to have.

So today's two questions on this subject are: